Library

This is all broken, contact me if you need one of these papers.

• Allison & Howard (2000). Temporal dependencies on resolving monocular and binocular cue conflict in slant perception. Vision Research, 40, 1869–1886.
• Allison, Howard, Rogers & Bridge (1998). Temporal aspects of slant and inclination perception. Perception, 27, 1287–1304.
• Allison, Rogers & Bradshaw (2003). Geometric and induced effects in binocular stereopsis and motion parallax. Vision Research, 43, 1879–1893.
• Ames (1946). Binocular vision as affected by relations between uniocular stimulus- patterns in commonplace environments. American Journal of Psychology, 59, 333– 357.
• Andersen & Kramer (1993) Limits of focused attention in three-dimensional space. Percept Psychophys. 53: 658-667.
• Armaly (1969) The Size and Location of the Normal Blind Spot. Arch Ophthalmol. 81: 192–201.
• Backus, (2002). Perceptual Metamers in Stereoscopic Vision. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 1223–1230.
• Backus (2009). The mixture of Bernoulli experts: A theory to quantify reliance on cues in dichotomous perceptual decisions. Journal of Vision, 9(1):6, 1–6.
• Backus & Banks (1999). Estimator reliability and distance scaling in stereoscopic slant perception. Perception, 28(2), 217–242.
• Backus, Banks, van Ee ∓ Crowell (1999). Horizontal and vertical disparity, eye position, and stereoscopic slant perception. Vision Research, 39, 1143– 1170.
• Backus & Matza-Brown (2003) The contribution of vergence change to the measurement of relative disparity. J Vis. 3(11): 737-750.
• Banks & Backus (1997). Extra-retinal and Perspective Cues Cause the Small Range of the Induced Effect. Vision Research, 38(2), 187–194.
• Banks, Hooge & Backus (2001). Perceiving slant about a horizontal axis from stereopsis. Journal of Vision, 1, 55–79.
• Barlow, Blakemore & Pettigrew (1967) The neural mechanism of binocular depth discrimination. Journal of Physiology. 193, 327–342.
• Barry (2009) Fixing my gaze: A scientist’s journey into seeing in three dimensions. New York, NY: Basic Books.
• Bennett & Vuong (2006) A stereo advantage in generalizing over changes in viewpoint on object recognition tasks. Percept Psychophys., 68: 1082-1093
• Blakemore (1970) The range and scope of binocular depth discrimination in man. J Physiol. 221: 599–622.
• Bogacz, Brown, Moehlis, Holmes & Regan (2006) The physics of optimal decision making: A formal analysis of models of performance in two-alternative forced-choice tasks. Psychological review, 113(4), 700–765
• Bogacz, Wagenmakers, Forstmann & Nieuwenhuis (2010) The neural basis of the speed–accuracy tradeoff. Trends in Neurosciences, 33, 10–16.
• Bradshaw, Hibbard & Gillam (2002) Perceptual latencies to discriminate surface orientation in stereopsis. Perception & Psychophysics, 64, 32–40.
• Bradshaw & Rogers (1999). Sensitivity to horizontal and vertical corrugations defined by binocular disparity. Vision Research, 39, 3049–3056.
• Breitmeyer & Ögmen (2006) Visual masking: Time slices through conscious and unconscious vision (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
• Brenner & Smeets (2006) Two eyes in action. Experimental Brain Research, 170, 302–311.
• Bridges, Morris, De Witt & Rutherford (1811) Map of the City of New-York and Island of Manhattan: With Explanatory Remarks and References.
• Brookes & Stevens (1989). The analogy between stereo depth and brightness. Perception, 18, 601–614.
• Burge & Geisler (2014) Optimal disparity estimation in natural stereo images. J Vis. 14: 1.
• Burke (2005) Combining disparate views of objects: Viewpoint costs are reduced by stereopsis. Vis Cogn., 12: 705–719
• Burke, Taubert & Higman (2007) Are face representations viewpoint dependent? A stereo advantage for generalising across different views of faces. Vision Res., 47: 2164–2169
• Busettini, Fitzgibbon & Miles (2001) Short-Latency Disparity Vergence in Humans. J Neurophysiol, 85, 1129-1152
• Bushnell, Harding, Kosai & Pasupathy (2011) Partial Occlusion Modulates Contour-Based Shape Encoding in Primate Area V4. J Neurosci. 31: 4012–4024.
• Cagenello & Rogers (1993). Anisotropies in the Perception of Stereoscopic Surfaces: the Role of Orientation Disparity. Vision Research, 33(16), 2189–2201.
• Carpenter & Williams (1995) Neural computation of log likelihood in control of saccadic eye movements. Nature, 377, 59–62.
• Carrasco, McElree, Denisova & Giordano (2003) Speed of visual processing increases with eccentricity. Nature Neuroscience, 6, 699–670.
• Caziot & Backus BT (2015) Stereoscopic Offset Makes Objects Easier to Recognize. PLoS ONE, 10(6): e0129101.
• Caziot, Valsecchi, Gegenfurtner & Backus (2015) Fast perception of binocular disparity. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 41(4): 909-916.
• Chopin, Levi, Knill & Bavelier (2016). The absolute disparity anomaly and the mechanism of relative disparities. Journal of Vision, 16(2), 1–17.
• Clark & Yuille (1990). Data fusion for sensory information processing systems. New York: Springer US.
• Cumming & Parker (1997) Responses of primary visual cortical neurons to binocular disparity without depth perception. Nature, 389, 280–283.
• Dambacher & Hübner (2013). Investigating the speed–accuracy trade-off: Better use deadlines or response signals? Behavioural Research, 45, 702–717.
• De Gardelle & Mamassian (2014) Does Confidence Use a Common Currency Across Two Visual Tasks? Psychol Sci. 25: 1286–1288.
• Dodwell & Engel (1995) A Theory of Binocular Fusion, Nature, 198(4875), 39-74.
• Dove (1841) Über die Combination der Eindrücke beider Ohren und beider Augen zu einem Eindruck [On the combination of the sensations of both ears and both eyes in a single sensation], Monatsberichte Der Berliner Preussischen Akademie Der Wissenschaften, 41, 251–252.
• Downing & Pinker (1985) The Spatial Structure of Visual Attention. Attention and Performance, XI. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. Hillsdale, N.J. pp 171–185.
• Driver, Davis, Russell, Turatto & Freeman (2001) Segmentation, attention and phenomenal visual objects. Cognition. 80: 61–95.
• Dünser, Billinghurst & Mancero (2008) Evaluating Visual Search Performance with a Multi Layer Display. OZCHI Proceedings.
• Edelman & Bülthoff (1992) Orientation Dependence in the Recognition of Familiar and Novel Views of the Three-Dimensional Objects. Vision Res., 32: 2385–2400
• Efron (1957) Stereoscopic vision. I. Effect of binocular temporal summation. British Journal of Ophthalmology, 41, 709–730.
• Elliott (1964) Tables of d’. in Swets, Signal detection and recognition by human observers. New York: Wiley; 1964. pp. 651–684.
• Enright (1991) Exploring the third dimension with eye movements: better than stereopsis. Vision Res. 31: 1549–1562.
• Ernst & Banks (2002). Humans integrate visual and haptic information in a statistically optimal fashion. Nature, 415(6870), 429–433.
• Fielder & Moseley (1996) Does stereopsis matter in humans? Eye, 10, 233–238.
• Finlayson, Remington, Retell & Grove (2013) Segmentation by depth does not always facilitate visual search. J Vis. 13: 1–14.
• Friedenwald (1892). Binocular Metamorphopsia Produced by Correcting Glasses. Archives of Ophthalmology, 21, 204–212.
• Fukuda, Kaneko & Matsumiya (2006). Vertical-size disparities are temporally integrated for slant perception. Vision Research, 46, 2749–2756.
• Gårding (1992). Shape from Texture for Smooth Curved Surfaces in Perspective Projection. Journal of Mathematical Imaging and Vision, 2, 327–350.
• Gawryszewski, Riggio, Rizzolatti & Umiltá (1987) Movements of attention in the three spatial dimensions and the meaning of “neutral” cues. Neuropsychologia. 25: 19–29. pp 171–185.
• Geblewicz & Shen (1936) Le rôle du temps dans la perception de la profondeur [The role of time in the perception of depth]. L’Année Psychologique, 37, 58–67.
• Gegenfurtner & Rieger (2000) Sensory and cognitive contributions of color to the recognition of natural scenes. Curr Biol. 10: 805–808.
• Gheorghiu & Erkelens (2005) Temporal properties of disparity processing revealed by dynamic random-dot stereograms. Perception, 34, 1205–1219.
• Gibson (1950). The perception of visual surfaces. American Journal of Psychology, 63, 367–384.
• Gillam (1968). Perception of slant when perspective and stereopsis conflict: Experiments with aniseikonic lenses. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 78(2), 299–305.
• Gillam, Chambers & Lawergren (1988). The role of vertical disparity in the scaling of stereoscopic depth perception: An empirical and theoretical study. Perception & Psychophysics, 44(5), 473–483.
• Gillam, Chambers & Russo (1988) Postfusional latency in stereoscopic slant perception and the primitives of stereopsis. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 14, 163–175.
• Gillam,, Flagg & Finlay (1984). Evidence for disparity change as the primary stimulus for stereoscopic processing. Perception & Psychophysics, 36(6), 559–564.
• Gillam, & Lawergren (1983). The role of vertical disparity in the scaling of stereoscopic depth perception: An empirical and theoretical study. Perception & Psychophysics, 44(5), 473–483.
• Gillam & Ryan (1992). Perspective, orientation disparity, and anisotropy in stereoscopic slant perception. Perception, 21, 427–439.
• Gold & Shadlen (2001) Neural computations that underlie decisions about sensory stimuli. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 5, 10–16.
• Gonzalez & Perez (1998) Neural mechanisms underlying stereoscopic vision. Progress in Neurobiology, 55, 191–224.
• Gonzalez, Perez, Justo & Bermudez (2001) Response latencies to visual stimulation and disparity sensitivity in single cells of the awake Macaca mulatta visual cortex. Neuroscience Letters, 299, 41–44.
• Goodale & Milner (1992). Separate visual pathways for perception and action. Trends in Neurosciences, 15(1), 20–25.
• Green & Swets (1966) Signal Detection Theory and Psychophysics. New York: Wiley.
• Green, J. (1889). On certain stereoscopical illusions evoked by prismatic and cylindrical spectacle glasses. Transactions of the American Ophthalmological Society, 5, 449–456.
• Greenwald & Knill (2009) A comparison of visuomotor cue integration strategies for object placement and prehension. Visual Neuroscience, 26, 63–72.
• Greenwald, Knill & Saunders (2005) Integrating visual cues for motor control: A matter of time. Vision Research, 45, 1975– 1989.
• Hacker & Ratcliff (1979) A revised table of d’ for M-alternative forced choice. Percept Psychophys. 26: 168–170.
• Harwerth & Boltz (1979) Stereopsis in monkeys using random dot stereograms: The effect of viewing duration. Vision Research, 19, 985–991.
• Heitz (2014) The speed-accuracy tradeoff: History, physiology, methodology, and behavior. Frontiers in Neuroscience, 8, 150.
• Heitz & Engle (2007). Focusing the spotlight: Individual differences in visual attention control. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 136(2), 217–240.
• Hering (1865) Die Gesetze der binocularen Tiefenwahrnehmung [The laws of binocular depth perception]. Archiv Fur Anatomie, Physiologie Und Wissenschaftliche Medecin, 152–165.
• Hering (1865) Die Gesetze der binocularen Tiefenwahrnehmung [The laws of binocular depth perception]. Archiv Fur Anatomie, Physiologie Und Wissenschaftliche Medecin, 152–165.
• Hibbard, Bradshaw, Langley & Rogers (2002). The stereoscopic anisotropy: Individual differences and underlying mechanisms. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 28(2), 469–476.
• Hibbard & Langley (1998). Plaid slant and inclination thresholds can be predicted from components. Vision Research, 38(8), 1073–1084.
• Hillis, Watt, Landy & Banks (2004). Slant from texture and disparity cues: Optimal cue combination. Journal of Vision, 4(12): 1, 967–992
• Howard & Rogers (2002) Seeing in Depth, Vol. 2: Depth perception. I. Porteous. Ontario.
• Hu & Knill (2011) Binocular and monocular depth cues in online feedback control of 3D pointing movement. Journal of Vision, 11, 23.
• Itti & Koch (2001) Computational modelling of visual attention. Nat Rev Neurosci., 2: 194–203.
• Jacobs (1999). Optimal integration of texture and motion cues to depth. Vision Research, 39(21), 3621–3629.
• Janssen, Vogels, Liu & Orban (2003) At least at the level of inferior temporal cortex, the stereo correspondence problem is solved. Neuron, 37, 693–701.
• Julesz (1960) Binocular depth perception of computer-generated patterns. Bell Syst Tech, 39.
• Julesz (1963) Stereopsis and binocular rivalry of contours. Journal of the Optical Society of America, 53, 994–999.
• Julesz (1971) Foundations of Cyclopean Perception. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
• Julesz & Payne (1968) Differences between monocular and binocular stroboscopic movement perception. Vision Research, 8, 433– 444.
• Julesz & White (1969) Short term visual memory and the Pulfrich phenomenon. Nature, 222, 639 – 641.
• Julesz & Oswald (1978) Binocular utilization of monocular cues that are undetectable monocularly. Perception. 7: 315–322.
• Kane, Guan & Banks (2014) The Limits of Human Stereopsis in Space and Time. J Neurosci. 34: 1397–1408.
• Keefe, Hibbard & Watt (2011) Depth-cue integration in grasp programming: No evidence for a binocular specialism. Neuropsychologia, 49, 1246–1257.
• Knill (1998a). Discriminating surface slant from texture: Comparing human and ideal observers. Vision Research, 38, 1683–1711.
• Knill (1998b). Surface orientation from texture: Ideal observers, generic observers, and the infor- mation content of texture cues. Vision Research, 38, 1655–1682.
• Knill (2005) Reaching for visual cues to depth: The brain combines depth cues differently for motor control and perception. Journal of Vision, 5, 103–115.
• Landy, Maloney, Johnston & Young (1995). Measurement and modeling of depth cue combination: In defense of weak fusion. Vision Research, 35(3), 389–412.
• Langlands (1926) Experiments on binocular vision. Transactions of the Optical Society of London, 28, 45.
• Lankheet & Lennie (1996) Spatio-temporal requirements for binocular correlation in stereopsis. Vision Research, 36, 527–538.
• Lappin & Disch (1972) The latency operating characteristic: I. Effects of stimulus probability on choice reaction time. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 92, 419–427.
• Le Conte (1897) Sight: An exploration of the principles of monocular and binocular vision. New York, NY: D. Appleton.
• Lee & Saunders (2011) Stereo improves 3D shape discrimination even when rich monocular shape cues are available. J Vis., 11: 1-12
• Lippincott (1889). On the binocular metamor- phopsia produced by correcting glasses. Archives of Ophthalmology, 18, 18–30.
• Lippincott (1917). On the binocular metamor- phopsia produced by optical means. Archives of Ophthalmology, 46, 397–426.
• Liu, Ward & Young (2006) Transfer between two- and three-dimensional representations of faces. Vis Cogn., 13: 51–64
• Luce (1986) Sight: Response times: Their role in inferring elementary mental organization. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
• Macmillan & Creelman (2005) Detection Theory: A User’s Guide ( 2nd ed.). New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
• McKee, Levi & Bowne (1990) The imprecision of stereopsis. Vision Research, 30, 1763–1779.
• Mamassian (1997). Prehension of objects oriented in three-dimensional space. Experimental Brain Research, 114, 235–245.
• Marr (1982). Vision. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
• Mayhew & Longuet-Higgins (1982). A computational model of binocular depth percep- tion. Nature, 297, 376–378.
• Mitchison & McKee (1990). Mechanisms underlying the anisotropy of stereoscopic tilt perception. Vision Research, 30(11), 1781–1791.
• Murphy, Ban & Welchman (2013). Integration of texture and disparity cues to surface slant in dorsal visual cortex. Journal of Neurophysiology, 110, 190–203.
• Nakayama & Silverman (1986) Serial and parallel processing of visual feature conjunctions. Nature., 320: 264–265
• Neri, Bridge & Heeger (2004) Stereoscopic processing of absolute and relative disparity in human visual cortex. Journal of Neurophysiology, 92, 1880–1891.
• Nguyenkim & DeAngelis (2003). Disparity-based coding of three-dimensional surface orientation by macaque middle temporal neurons. The Journal of Neuroscience, 23(18), 7117– 7128.
• Nienborg, Bridge, Parker & Cumming (2005) Neuronal computation of disparity in V1 limits temporal resolution for detecting disparity modulation. Journal of Neuroscience, 25, 10207–10219.
• Norcia & Tyler (1984) Temporal frequency limits for stereoscopic apparent motion processes. Vision Research, 24, 395–401.
• Norman, Todd & Orban (2004) Perception of Three-Dimensional Shape From Specular Highlights, Deformations of Shading, and Other Types of Visual Information. Psychol Sci., 15: 565–570
• O’Toole & Walker (1997) On the preattentive accessibility of stereoscopic disparity: Evidence from visual search. Percept Psychophys. 59: 202–218.
• Ogle (1938). Induced size effect: I. A new phenomenon in binocular space perception associated with the relative sizes of the images of the two eyes. Archives of Ophthalmology, 20(4), 604–623.
• Ogle (1952) On the limits of stereoscopic vision. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 44, 253–259.
• Ogle (1953) Precision and Validity of Stereoscopic Depth Perception from Double Images. JOSA. 43: 906–913.
• Ogle (1956) Stereoscopic acuity and the role of convergence. J Opt Soc Am. 46: 269–273.
• Ogle (1962) Spatial Localization Through Binocular Vision. in Davson, The Eye: Visual optics and the optical space sense. 2nd ed. New York: Academic Press. pp 271–324.
• Ogle & Weil (1958) Stereoscopic vision and the duration of the stimulus. AMA Archives of Ophthalmology, 59, 4–17.
• Orban (2011). The extraction of 3D shape in the visual system of human and nonhuman primates. The Annual Review of Neuroscience, 34, 361–388.
• Pachella (1974) The interpretation of reaction time in information-processing research. In B. H. Kantowitz (Ed.), Human information processing: Tutorial in performance and recognition (pp. 41–82). New York, NY: Wiley.
• Panum (1858) Physiologische untersuchungen über das sehen mit zwei augen [Physiological studies on seeing with two eyes]. Kiel, Germany: Schwerssche Buchhandlung.
• Parker (2007) Binocular depth perception and the cerebral cortex. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 8, 379–391.
• Peirce & Jastrow (1885) On Small Differences in Sensation. Mem Natl Acad Sci. 3: 73–83.
• Poggio & Fischer (1977) Binocular interaction and depth sensitivity in striate and prestriate cortex of behaving rhesus monkey. Journal of Neurophysiology, 40, 1392–1405.
• Qiu & von der Heydt (2005) Figure and Ground in the Visual Cortex: V2 Combines Stereoscopic Cues with Gestalt Rules. Neuron. 47: 155–166.
• Rashbass & Westheimer (1961) Disjunctive eye movements. Journal of Physiology, 159, 339–360.
• Ratcliff (1993) Methods for dealing with reaction time outliers. Psychological Bulletin, 114, 510–532.
• Ratcliff & Rouder (1998) Modeling response times for two-choice decisions. Psychological Science, 9, 347–356.
• Regan & Beverley (1973a) The dissociation of sideways movements from movements in depth: Psychophysics. Vision Research, 13, 2403–2415.
• Regan & Beverley (1973b) Some dynamic features of depth perception. Vision Research, 13, 2369–2379.
• Richards (1951) The effect of alternating views of the test object on Vernier and stereoscopic acuities. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 42, 376–383.
• Richards (1951) Response functions for sine- and square-wave modulations of disparity. Journal of the Optical Society of America, 62, 907–911.
• Richards (1977) Stereopsis with and without monocular contours. Vision Res. 17: 967–969.
• Robinson (1966) The mechanics of human vergence eye movement. Journal of Pediatric Ophthalmology, 3, 31–37.
• Roelfsema, Lamme & Spekreijse (1998) Object-based attention in the primary visual cortex of the macaque monkey. Nature. 395: 376–381.
• Rogers & Bradshaw (1993). Vertical disparities, differential perspective and binocular stereopsis. Nature, 361(6409), 253–244.
• Rogers & Graham (1983). Anisotropies in the perception of three-dimensional surfaces. Science, 221(4618), 1409–1411.
• Rosenberg, Cowan & Angelaki (2013). The visual representation of 3D object orientation in parietal cortex. The Journal of Neuroscience, 33(49), 19352–19361.
• Rousselet, Fabre-Thorpe & Thorpe (2002) Parallel processing in high-level categorization of natural images. Nature Neuroscience, 5, 629–630.
• Salinas, Shankar, Costello, Zhu & Stanford (2010). Waiting is the hardest part: Comparison of two computational strategies for performing a compelled-response task. Frontiers in Computational Neuroscience, 4(153), 1–17.
• Saunders & Backus (2006). Perception of surface slant from oriented textures. Journal of Vision, 6(9):3, 882–897.
• Schlicht & Schrater (2007) Effects of visual uncertainty on grasping movements. Experimental Brain Research, 182, 47–57.
• Schouten & Bekker (1967) Reaction time and accuracy. Acta Psychologica, 27, 143–153.
• Sheedy, Bailey, Buri & Bass (1986) Binocular vs. monocular task performance. American Journal of Optometry and Physiological Optics, 63, 839–846.
• Shortess & Krauskopf (1961) Role of involuntary eye movements in stereoscopic acuity. Journal of the Optical Society of America, 51, 555–559.
• Sperling (1960) The information available in brief visual presentations. Psychol Monogr Gen Appl.74: 1–29.
• Stanford, Shankar, Massoglia, Costello & Salinas (2010) Perceptual decision making in less than 30 milliseconds. Nature Neuroscience, 13, 379–385.
• Steinman (1987) Serial and parallel search in pattern vision? Perception. 16: 389–398.
• Sternberg (1969) The discovery of processing stages: Extensions of Donders’ method. Acta Psychologica, 30, 276–315.
• Stevens (1980). Surface Perception from Local Analysis of Texture and Contour (Technical Report No. AI-TR-512). Cambridge, MA: Computer Science and Artificial Intelligence Lab, MIT.
• Stevens & Brookes (1988). Integrating stereopsis with monocular interpretations of planar surfaces. Vision Research, 28, 371–386.
• Taira, Tsutsui, Jiang, Yara & Sakata (2000). Parietal neurons represent surface orientation from the gradient of binocular disparity. Journal of Neurophysiology, 83(5), 3140– 3146.
• Trotter, Celebrini, Stricanne, Thorpe & Imbert (1996) Neural processing of stereopsis as a function of viewing distance in primate visual cortical area V1. Journal of Neurophysiology, 76, 2872–2885.
• Tsutsui, Sakata, Naganuma & Taira (2002). Neural correlates for perception of 3D surface orientation from texture gradient. Science, 298, 409–412.
• Tyler (1991) The Horopter and Binocular Fusion. In: Regan D, Cronly-Dillon JR, editors. Vision and Visual Dysfunction: Binocular Vision. Boca Raton, FL, USA: CRC Press. pp. 19–37.
• Tyler (1991) Cyclopean vision. In D. Regan (Ed.), Vision and visual dysfunction: Vol. 9. Binocular vision (pp. 38–74). London, United Kingdom: MacMillan.
• Uttal, Fitzgerald & Eskin (1975) Parameters of tachistoscopic stereopsis. Vision Research, 15, 705–712.
• Valsecchi & Gegenfurtner (2015) Control of binocular gaze in a high-precision manual task. Vision Research, 110, 203–214.
• Valsecchi, Caziot, Backus & Gegenfurtner (2013) The Role of Binocular Disparity in Rapid Scene and Pattern Recognition. iPerception, 4(2): 122-136.
• van Ee, Banks & Backus (1999). An analysis of binocular slant contrast. Perception, 28(9), 1121–1145.
• van Ee & Erkelens (1995) Binocular perception of slant about oblique axes relative to a visual frame of reference. Perception, 24, 299–314.
• van Ee & Erkelens (1996) Temporal aspects of binocular slant perception. Vision Research, 36, 43–51.
• van Ee & Erkelens (1998) Temporal aspects of stereoscopic slant estimation: An evaluation and extension of Howard and Kaneko’s theory. Vision Research, 38, 3871–3882.
• van Mierlo, Louw, Smeets & Brenner (2009). Slant cues are processed with different latencies for the online control of move- ment. Journal of Vision, 9(3):25, 1–8.
• Velisavljevic & Elder (2006). Texture properties affecting the accuracy of surface attitude judgments. Vision Research, 46, 2166–2191.
• Vickers (1979). Decision processes in visual perception. London, UK: Academic Press Inc.
• Volkmann (1859) Das Tachistoskop, ein Instrument, welches bei Untersuchung des momentanen Sehens den Gebrauch des elektrischen Funkens ersetzt [The Tachistoscope, an instrument that replaces the use of electric sparks for the study of momentary vision]. Berichte Über Die Verhandlungen Der Königlich Sächsischen Gesellschaft Der Wissen-schaften Zu Leipzig: Mathematisch-Physische Classe, 11, 90–98.
• von Helmholtz (1867) Handbuch der physiologischen optik [Handbook of physiological optics] (Vol. 3). Leipzig, Germany: Leopold Voss.
• Watt, Akeley, Ernst & Banks (2005). Focus cues affect perceived depth. Journal of Vision, 5(10):7, 1–29.
• Wardle, Cass, Brooks & Alais (2010) Breaking camouflage: Binocular disparity reduces contrast masking in natural images. J Vis. 10: 1–12
• Wheatstone (1838) Contributions to the physiology of vision.—Part the first. On some remarkable, and hitherto unobserved, phenomena of binocular vision. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London, 128, 371–394.
• Wickelgren (1977) Speed-accuracy tradeoff and information processing dynamics. Acta Psychologica, 41, 67–85.
• Wilcox & Allison (2009) Coarse–fine dichotomies in human stereopsis. Vision Research, 49, 2653–2665.
• Witkin (1981). Recovering surface shape and orientation from texture. Artificial Intelligence, 17, 17–45.
• Wolfe (1998) Visual Search. Attention. University College London Press. London
• Zhou, Friedman & Von der Heydt (2000) Representation of stereoscopic edges in monkey visual cortex. Vision Res. 40: 1955–1967.